Your ES quals.

*CUL 12/2009
*FASC 5/2010
GES (No Expire)
*GTM3 3/2009
*IO 5/2010
*LO 5/2010
MRO 11/2010
MSA 11/2010
*MSO 5/2010
SET (No Expire)
UDF 12/2009
IS100 (No Expire)
IS200 (No Expire)

Wow. I have GES and UDF(t).

GTM3
GTM2
GTM1
GTL (All except for being 18 )
SARTECH 3
SARTECH 2
ROA

Urban Direction Finding (am in the process of Requalifying Now)- Texas SET LIST Approver
Ground Team Level 3
Mission Radio Operator- Texas SET LIST Approver
Mission Staff Assistant

Remember, qualification is not an "end" it is a beginning. You have to keep yourself as "current" as you can. That's what Semper Vigilans is about.

GES
ICS 100, 200, 700, 800
Recertifying on GTM2, GTM1, GTL, MRO, and UDF
I was out for a while and rejoined last fall.
I'll also hopefully soon be starting in a scanner/observer class.

GTM 3
GTM 2
GTM1*
ICS 100
ICS 200
ICS 700
I was the first one to have them all done in the Indiana wing.
Flight Marshaller trainee
question:what's SARTECH?

MSA, MRO, UDF, MS, MO, TMP, MP, AOBD, FASC, PSC

George Stinson
CD Sched Off, IT Off, Asst. DO
Ky Wing

GES
SET
GTM3
GTM2
GTM1
GTL*
UDF
ICS 100
ICS 200
ICS 700
Wing Walker
Flight marshaller

SARTECH is the Ground Team qualifications created by NASAR (National Association for Search and Rescue). Unlike CAP Ground Team quals, they are recongnized by other organizations (including CAP) and therefore a very good thing to have.

Stands for "Search and Rescue Technician".

*Update:

GTM3
GTM2
GTM1*
GES
SET
IS-100
IS-200
IS-700
MSA*
MRO*
FLM
ICS-300

ROA

GTM3
ROA
is-100
SET
GES

swater wrote:GTM3
ROA
is-100
SET
GES

I can almost guarantee you, that you are not SET qualified by the Wing. In Texas, having SET on your 101 does not mean you are SET qualified. You have to be on the special "list" and very few people are.

sgtniedrauer wrote:

swater wrote:GTM3
ROA
is-100
SET
GES

I can almost guarantee you, that you are not SET qualified by the Wing. In Texas, having SET on your 101 does not mean you are SET qualified. You have to be on the special "list" and very few people are.

No, he is not on the list. I am not on the list either, I just have the qual "SET" which you need to even get considered for the SET list. MY squadron commander is going to try to get me on the list. We will see how that goes...

GTM 3,2,1
UDF
MRO
FLM*
GTL*
GBD*
MSA*
SET

I also have all the tests and requirements (Like GES, IS 100, etc), I just didn't think it was worth listing.........

Bring it on! Lets go find me some lost person(s)!!!! or lost airplanes....or wat ever you go!

Ok....I'll calm down....SAR gets me pumped!

K_Poskey wrote:Bring it on! Lets go find me some lost person(s)!!!! or lost airplanes....or wat ever you go!

Ok....I'll calm down....SAR gets me pumped!

Well....I'm not too excited about the way CAP has been sluggish about expanding ES. Quite frankly, if CAP doesn't find something more then ELTs to deal with, then we're gonna be shut down in the next 5 years. ELTs are a thing of the past. It's time to find something else.

sgtniedrauer wrote:

K_Poskey wrote:Bring it on! Lets go find me some lost person(s)!!!! or lost airplanes....or wat ever you go!

Ok....I'll calm down....SAR gets me pumped!

Well....I'm not too excited about the way CAP has been sluggish about expanding ES. Quite frankly, if CAP doesn't find something more then ELTs to deal with, then we're gonna be shut down in the next 5 years. ELTs are a thing of the past. It's time to find something else.

I couldn't agree more. If we could expand our ES range, we could achieve a lot more in a wider span.

Add01 wrote:

sgtniedrauer wrote:

K_Poskey wrote:Bring it on! Lets go find me some lost person(s)!!!! or lost airplanes....or wat ever you go!

Ok....I'll calm down....SAR gets me pumped!

Well....I'm not too excited about the way CAP has been sluggish about expanding ES. Quite frankly, if CAP doesn't find something more then ELTs to deal with, then we're gonna be shut down in the next 5 years. ELTs are a thing of the past. It's time to find something else.

I couldn't agree more. If we could expand our ES range, we could achieve a lot more in a wider span.

That's true to an extent, but if we expand too much, we will be "treading" on other SAR organizations turf.

This would not be good for public relations.

However, I do agree that it would be nice to expand the amount of operations we conduct IN ADDTION to missing aircraft/ELT.

I know here in Colorado Springs, we will be working with different organizations (such as the red cross, all county SAR teams, military, etc) to increase our ES activity in natural disasters, missing people, and other emergency sitatutions.

Its most likely completely up to your Squadorn ESO to determine how active you are when your not searching for airplanes...........